Since I have not had as much time to study this I will just list some points that must be considered. This is one reason why just reporting the percentage of anomalies has little meaning. RAUP Chicago Field Museum Prof. Also one of my graduate students went to work for Ferguson in his lab at U of A and in fact was the curator of his work after his death and is presently probably the only one who knows anything about how he Ferguson produced the bristlecone chronology. Harold Coffin Origin by Design page
Citation needed To date these assumptions are supported by much scientific observation and repeated isotopic dates and it is certainly a more robust hypothesis than that which assumes a terrestrial rock has retained its original composition. Y cX cZI found the following statement in an online non creationist reference as followsRoughly contemporaneous with the time of the Aztec Empire this period was characterized by what OHara described as staggeringly high environmental impacts and erosion rates of metric tons of soil per hectare tons per acre per year. This is true even if the earth really is billion years old. Thus we can get an apparent correlation of different methods without much of a real correlation in nature. Their values were consistent with Thomsons calculations. Thus we obtain KAr dating UPb dating and RbSr dating three of the most common methods. William Smiths nephew and student John Phillips later calculated by such means that Earth was about million years old. By the time the crust got around to bending the Gulf would probably be almost full
In the atmosphere of the earth Ar constitutes of the total argon. Both of these tend on the average to have wide biostrategraphic limits meaning that a large spread of ages will be regarded as nonanomalous. For a wimpy isochron say a KAr isochron we can assume that initially there is a uniform concentration of K everywhere and concentrations of Ar and Ar that form an isochron. The magma deeper down would have come to the surface later and thus would be nearer to the midAtlantic ridge. If the igneous body is constrained to have a date between that of geologic period X and X with times T and T and if we regard any date within percent as nonanomalous then any date between T and T will be considered as nonanomalous and this will include a considerable portion of geologic history. Groundwater and erosional water movements could produce this effect naturally. Since Cambrian and later rocks are largely sedimentary and igneous volcanic rocks are found in Cambrian and later strata if these rocks are really million years old then life must also be at least million years old. Do different methods agree with each other on the geologic column from Woodmorappe An Anthology of Matters Significant to Creationism and Diluviology Report Creation Research Society Quarterly March p. So the evidence is that conditions in the past when these deposits were being laid down were much different than at present. Extrusive bodies are lava that is deposited on the surface. In addition lava emerging later will tend to be hotter coming from deeper in the earth and through channels that have already been warmed up
It seems to me to be a certainty that water and gas will enter rocks through tiny cracks and invalidate almost all radiometric ages. But I believe that their message is true namely God created the universe the earth and all that is in it God created life on earth recently and the earth since then has experienced a major catastrophe. Coffin writesAt the temperature or pressure collisions with stray cosmic rays or the emanations of other atoms may cause changes other than those of normal disintegration. It seems reasonable to me that the large radiometric ages are simply a consequence of mixing and not related to ages at all at least not necessarily the reasons for dating an older man ages of the rocks themselves. I do thank Tim Thomson for the courteous and professional manner in which he has interacted with me and that he has included the rest of my exchange with Dr. We can assume that the Precambrian rocks already existed when life began and so the ages of the Precambrian rocks are not necessarily related to the question of how long life has existed on earth. This suggested that it might be possible to measure the age of Earth by determining the relative proportions of radioactive materials in geological samples. It takes a long time to penetrate the confusion and find out what is the hard evidence in this area. Their conclusion is that argon is held primarily in lattice vacancy defects within the minerals. I believe that there is a great need for this information to be made known so I am making office dating policy this article available in the hopes that it will enlighten others who are considering these questions. Now some rocks in the crust are believed not to Deer hunting dating site hold their argon so this argon will gumtree dating cape town enter the spaces between the rocks
The fact that these are separate papers and the fact that every attempt was made to avoid contamination suggests that these are two different incidents. Kelvin calculated the age of the Earth by using thermal gradients and he arrived at an estimate of about million years. Some rings may even show frost or fire damage. Had Plaisted actually bothered to look at the data. Someone gave me some information about constructing tree ring chronologies by piecing together subchronologies. But are dates from mica always accepted and irish dating sites free do they always agree with the age of their geologic period I suspect not. Its not clear to me if this three dimensional plot always works and how often it is used
By measuring the concentration of the stable end product of the decay coupled with knowledge of the half life and initial concentration of the decaying element the age of the rock can be calculated. If the radii of these haloes from the same nuclide vary this would imply that the decay rates have varied and would invalidate these series as being actual clocks. A survey of the radiocarbon dates published through the year in the publication Radiocarbon revealed the following significant facts a. Of the n which has decayed about will have decayed into calcium and the remaining will have decayed into argon. Thus the chronology was not subjected to the normal rigors of science
Nbsp nbsp Excuses for anomalies Another issue is that sometimes the geologic periods of rocks are revised to agree with the ages computed. One way to infer how the atmospheric concentration of carbon changed in the past is by treering dating. of Chicago A great deal has changed however and contemporary geologists and paleontologists now generally accept catastrophe as a way of life although they may avoid the word catastrophe. Concerning this issue one individual sent me the following informationCarbon datingnbspThe branching ratio that is often used is while the true value is probably about. In geologist Charles Lyell dating website introduction paragraph developing ideas found in James Hutton s works popularized the concept that the features of Earth were in perpetual change eroding and reforming continuously and the rate of this change was roughly constant. The oceans near the continents would be receiving erosion just like the Atlantic so they would not rise much Russian photos dating sites either. It is known that neutrinos interact with atomic nucleii so a larger density of neutrinos could have sped up radioactive decay and made matter look old in a hurry. This amount of argon is enough to raise times the volume of magma to a KAr age of million years and probably times the volume of the magam to an age of million years. nbsp nbsp Why methods in general are inaccurate I admit this is a very beautiful theory. This will result in artificially increased how is online dating good KAr ages. This shows that they contain some excess argon and not all of it is escaping
He dated a rock in his possession to an age of million years by this technique. is a little hard to explain away as the result of a number of unlucky coincidences in a daylong flood. So its not clear 25 year old woman dating a 21 year old man to me how one can be sure of the billion year age even assuming Hiv dating sites in uk a constant decay rate. If one does not know the geologic period of a rock by other means then of course one is likely to date it to find out and then of course the date agrees with the geologic period and this will not be seen as anomalous. This applies to several geologic periods. He performed measurements on rock samples and concluded in that the oldest a sample from Ceylon was about billion years old
Now years is about half lives of C which means that a contamination of slightly less would be required to achieve this date for a sample of infinite age. The strata extend for scores and even hundreds of miles with relatively little change in composition texture and thickness. So one obtains a series of minerals crystallizing out of the lava. Of course so much sediment entering the ocean would cause the sea level to rise to some extent. I believe that this will produce a good KAr isochron but the age calculated will be meaningless. Of the or so anomalous dates in Woodmorappe involve illite and glauconite which because of their crystalline structures are notoriously unreliable in giving KAr dates